The Official Website Of Author PETER THOMAS SENESELETTER OF SUPPORT
IN 2006 I RACED INTO A STORM CALLED INTERNATIONAL PARENTAL CHILD ABDUCTION THAT I HAD NEVER EVEN HEARD EXISTED. WHAT I SOON CAME TO LEARN WAS THAT FOR ANY PARENT FACING THIS TYPE OF NIGHTMARE, THE OBSTACLES ONE FACES ARE IMMENSE, AND OFTEN TIMES LEAVES THE TARGETED PARENT NOT BELIEVING IN ANY TYPE OF LEGAL SYSTEM. THIS SAID, I KNOW HOW FORTUNATE I AM TO HAVE BEEN ABLE TO REUNITE WITH MY CHILD. I ALSO KNOW I AM IN THE MINORITY.
ONE OF THE GREAT CHALLENGES THAT ALL TARGETED PARENTS FACE IS THE BRUTAL ATTEMPT BY THE CRIMINALLY ABDUCTING PARENT TO DEFAME AND SLANDER THE TARGETED PARENTS NAME AND REPUTATION. THIS IS DONE DUE TO AN INTERNATIONAL LAW LOOPHOLE (ARTICLE 13(B) OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION) THAT COULD ALLOW FOR AN INTERNATIONAL COURT TO RULE IN FAVOR OF THE ABDUCTING PARENT IF THEY BELIEVE THE CHILD IS IN GRAVE RISK. SO, IN ORDER TO ATTEMPT KIDNAPPING PROSECTUION UNDER U.S. LAW, NEARLY EVERY CHILD-STEALING PARENT WILL DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO PUBLICLY PORTRAY THE TARGETED PARENT IN POOR LIGHT. I WAS DEFINITELY NOT IMMUNE TO THIS. HOWEVER, IN MY CASE, COURTS AT EVERY LEVEL REALIZED THIS AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE SCHEME THAT HAD BEEN PUT IN PLACE. UNFORTUNATELY, DURING THIS TIME, THERE WERE TWO INDIVIDUALS THAT I ONCE WAS ASSOCIATED WITH WHO ALSO DECIDED TO JOIN IN AND SLANDER MY NAME UNDER ALIAS NAMES AND GUISES. THESE SWORN LETTERS SHOWS A VERY DIFFERENT TRUTH. I HAVE POSTED THEM IN ORDER TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT EVERY TARGETED PARERT OF CHILD ABDUCTION FACES. FORTUNATELY IN MY CASE, THE COURT'S REALIZED THE PLOT AGAINST ME AND ACTED IN MY BEST INTEREST.
. . . PETER THOMAS SENESE
